|
Post by petulant on Jun 21, 2008 22:41:42 GMT -5
Do you know who mutton gets her info from? now she is saying the GA gathering on Thursdays was not a weekly occurence. She claims to have all this wonderful inside info but who does she get it from?? Mutton even claims she has seen and read the SW's which I think she is out an out lying about that as well as every other thing she posts over there. If she has seen and read those SW's and thinks they cleared Jboy - then she must be using that same logic she used when she claimed LE was scowling in the pics at the Lady Bug memorial. I'm not sure who is giving her info - quite frankly, I think she makes it up as she goes along. She MAY have been in touch w/kingcole/gojo on the boards, or maybe even Kim/justthefacts (hence her lovely nic "justfacts"- but if you know her history, she knows no one. She's an intruder and a defender of all that is unholy). She is in gojo's category so far as I'm concerned - she knows squat! She seems to interject herself on a lot of cases and it's never a pretty sight. I remember her as CateKelly (I think that's the old nic) on the Trenton Duckett board and she was a horrible personality there. Bashing the mother (who I think possibly did do in that child, but regardless, she was a horrible person). She is just contrary and loves the attention. Same as the K4E - attention - positive or negative, pay attention to MEEEEE!
|
|
|
Post by petulant on Jun 21, 2008 22:45:36 GMT -5
Hah! That was Card's first post on this board - s/he came and dissed me because I announced that IS was closed for a weekend. It was just an announcement, not a proclamation that things were going to go downhill. Card is probably one of Kat's incarnations - s/he has so many it's hard to tell what's what and who's who! Actually, I think Card is quite fair. She really does look at both sides but she has admitted she will not proclaim J guilty until he is convicted by a jury. I think she knows deep down inside that Jboy is the culprit but she still wants to hear both sides. I don't think she is a Kat incarnation only because I've seen her go after Kat. I've seen her go after Mutton, AE and many of the JII's there. I don't know. S/he seems to be fair most times, but to come on board & attack the first post - gives me reason to question their motives. I'll get back to you on Monday about this. I have a working theory that I'm going to put out there after further investigation.
|
|
|
Post by jezme on Jun 21, 2008 22:54:58 GMT -5
And now 43 claims I baited her ... I only answered her question about how I would feel about the pres wearing a red tie. Nope, not her fault she went into her rant ... always someone else made her do it. Unbelievable.
|
|
|
Post by jezme on Jun 21, 2008 23:06:07 GMT -5
Actually, I think Card is quite fair. She really does look at both sides but she has admitted she will not proclaim J guilty until he is convicted by a jury. I think she knows deep down inside that Jboy is the culprit but she still wants to hear both sides. I don't think she is a Kat incarnation only because I've seen her go after Kat. I've seen her go after Mutton, AE and many of the JII's there. I don't know. S/he seems to be fair most times, but to come on board & attack the first post - gives me reason to question their motives. I'll get back to you on Monday about this. I have a working theory that I'm going to put out there after further investigation. Oh please don't make we wait until Monday! Let me know as soon as you have it all worked out.
|
|
|
Post by petulant on Jun 21, 2008 23:17:10 GMT -5
And now 43 claims I baited her ... I only answered her question about how I would feel about the pres wearing a red tie. Nope, not her fault she went into her rant ... always someone else made her do it. Unbelievable. It's sad, or funny, whichever way you look at it. They, (the kamijucou), never take responsibility for their posts, going off-topic or baiting. Everyone but THEY are to blame... anyone but JASON LYNN YOUNG is to blame ... ya feel the theme?
|
|
|
Post by petulant on Jun 21, 2008 23:18:01 GMT -5
I don't know. S/he seems to be fair most times, but to come on board & attack the first post - gives me reason to question their motives. I'll get back to you on Monday about this. I have a working theory that I'm going to put out there after further investigation. Oh please don't make we wait until Monday! Let me know as soon as you have it all worked out. Oh, I won't make you wait any longer than necessary, but this requires some sleuthing,
|
|
|
Post by jezme on Jun 22, 2008 8:47:02 GMT -5
And now 43 claims I baited her ... I only answered her question about how I would feel about the pres wearing a red tie. Nope, not her fault she went into her rant ... always someone else made her do it. Unbelievable. It's sad, or funny, whichever way you look at it. They, (the kamijucou), never take responsibility for their posts, going off-topic or baiting. Everyone but THEY are to blame... anyone but JASON LYNN YOUNG is to blame ... ya feel the theme? It will be extremely interesting come Monday to see if either one of us are banned for going OT. If it is just me ... then we will know for certain that that board is "lopsided" to say the least. If we are both banned, then it is totally fair as we both deserved it. If it is just her, then I won't think that is too fair either. It really should be both or none at all.
|
|
|
Post by petulant on Jun 22, 2008 11:49:04 GMT -5
It's sad, or funny, whichever way you look at it. They, (the kamijucou), never take responsibility for their posts, going off-topic or baiting. Everyone but THEY are to blame... anyone but JASON LYNN YOUNG is to blame ... ya feel the theme? It will be extremely interesting come Monday to see if either one of us are banned for going OT. If it is just me ... then we will know for certain that that board is "lopsided" to say the least. If we are both banned, then it is totally fair as we both deserved it. If it is just her, then I won't think that is too fair either. It really should be both or none at all. CW doesn't take holidays when it comes to banning people. If you were going to be gone, it would have happened, unless the missing segment of the kamijucou returns and whines.
|
|
|
Post by jezme on Jun 22, 2008 12:03:58 GMT -5
It will be extremely interesting come Monday to see if either one of us are banned for going OT. If it is just me ... then we will know for certain that that board is "lopsided" to say the least. If we are both banned, then it is totally fair as we both deserved it. If it is just her, then I won't think that is too fair either. It really should be both or none at all. CW doesn't take holidays when it comes to banning people. If you were going to be gone, it would have happened, unless the missing segment of the kamijucou returns and whines. Ah, that would be k4e ... and if that happens ... then what everyone has been speculating across the boards, would be true. That k4e is, in fact, the moderator of that forum.
|
|
|
Post by petulant on Jun 22, 2008 12:21:29 GMT -5
CW doesn't take holidays when it comes to banning people. If you were going to be gone, it would have happened, unless the missing segment of the kamijucou returns and whines. Ah, that would be k4e ... and if that happens ... then what everyone has been speculating across the boards, would be true. That k4e is, in fact, the moderator of that forum. By George, I think you've got it! CW was busy closing forums last evening - there has to be more than one of it keeping watch over yonder.
|
|
|
Post by jezme on Jun 22, 2008 13:35:05 GMT -5
It irritates the ever-loving shite out of me when some posters know what the intent of your post is yet continually pick it a part. It is not just my posts but any post that does not shed JY in a good light. It is also not all of the JII's who do it. It is 3 of them. They know exactly what you mean but rather than argue the post, they argue the semantics of the post.
|
|
|
Post by petulant on Jun 22, 2008 13:59:05 GMT -5
It irritates the ever-loving nutse out of me when some posters know what the intent of your post is yet continually pick it a part. It is not just my posts but any post that does not shed JY in a good light. It is also not all of the JII's who do it. It is 3 of them. They know exactly what you mean but rather than argue the post, they argue the semantics of the post. It's all a big game to them. They don't care that Michelle and Rylan were murdered by Jason Lynn Young.
|
|
|
Post by jezme on Jun 22, 2008 14:22:12 GMT -5
It irritates the ever-loving nutse out of me when some posters know what the intent of your post is yet continually pick it a part. It is not just my posts but any post that does not shed JY in a good light. It is also not all of the JII's who do it. It is 3 of them. They know exactly what you mean but rather than argue the post, they argue the semantics of the post. It's all a big game to them. They don't care that Michelle and Rylan were murdered by Jason Lynn Young. So sad, but so true.
|
|
|
Post by rosebud on Jun 22, 2008 16:21:52 GMT -5
It irritates the ever-loving nutse out of me when some posters know what the intent of your post is yet continually pick it a part. It is not just my posts but any post that does not shed JY in a good light. It is also not all of the JII's who do it. It is 3 of them. They know exactly what you mean but rather than argue the post, they argue the semantics of the post. That is all they have and they are so predictable. They know that JY is guilty. They just like to argue. It's what they do. After the arrest their mantra will be rush to judgement, tunnel vision, and poor police work.
|
|
|
Post by jezme on Jun 22, 2008 17:59:15 GMT -5
It irritates the ever-loving nutse out of me when some posters know what the intent of your post is yet continually pick it a part. It is not just my posts but any post that does not shed JY in a good light. It is also not all of the JII's who do it. It is 3 of them. They know exactly what you mean but rather than argue the post, they argue the semantics of the post. That is all they have and they are so predictable. They know that JY is guilty. They just like to argue. It's what they do. After the arrest their mantra will be rush to judgement, tunnel vision, and poor police work. I guess so. The last case I followed this closely was Scooter and Ma "I want those now". He certainly had his fair share of loonies on that board as well. And it got even worse after the arrest. And believe it or not, it was worse than that during the trial and after as well. Now we have the civil trial and it has gotten no better. I'm sure the same will happen with this one. It will go from bad to worse and there really is no worst because just when you think that can sink no lower .... they do.
|
|