|
Post by janetruth on May 26, 2008 15:16:52 GMT -5
I'm still pretty sure that they have to build a case that does not even allude to Jason's Constitutional elusiveness.
Just sayin...
|
|
|
Post by petulant on May 26, 2008 15:19:23 GMT -5
I can't argue with a thing you've written here. Thanks for the thought provoking question. I won't start on the divorce rate, pre-nups, bla bla bla - all added together, things most certainly aren't as they were back in the day. People have lost respect for human life. Look at how many babies are thrown away, even when the mother could leave it safely on a fire station step or ER. Still. Huge changes have happened in society before this. This phenomenon is societally destructive. The ethic of "women and children first" is designed to preserve the species. This upsurge in killings of pregnant women is counter-productive to society as a whole. Empathy, or the ability to imagine ourselves in another's shoes, must be taught. Unless small children hear "how would you feel if somebody did that to you?" every time they hurt another living thing, they never will learn it. Obviously, these killers have a sense of entitlement. They feel that they are entitled to do what they want, and the wishes of others mean nothing. Well said. Teachers have become parents, but can only do so much in the time alotted to them in the classroom. It is up to the parents to take the reins and teach their children right from wrong and be consistent. eh, there's so much more, but not enough time and probably should be another board. I think momma Pat and Jason Lynn Young's sisters had a big hand in how he turned out. He got what he wanted, when he wanted it and I might say the retired teacher did him no good, either.
|
|
|
Post by petulant on May 26, 2008 15:20:48 GMT -5
I'm still pretty sure that they have to build a case that does not even allude to Jason's Constitutional elusiveness. Just sayin... but but but - the DA can't control the responses of those he's questioning! ;D
|
|
|
Post by janetruth on May 26, 2008 15:35:47 GMT -5
I'm still pretty sure that they have to build a case that does not even allude to Jason's Constitutional elusiveness. Just sayin... but but but - the DA can't control the responses of those he's questioning! ;D I believe he must, at least to that extent. I have heard that any mention of Jason's non-cooperation will create grounds for a mistrial. My opinion, only.
|
|
|
Post by petulant on May 26, 2008 15:49:14 GMT -5
but but but - the DA can't control the responses of those he's questioning! ;D I believe he must, at least to that extent. I have heard that any mention of Jason's non-cooperation will create grounds for a mistrial. My opinion, only. I guess it will be up to the judge if that little tidbit sneaks in. S/he will have the power to determine whether or not it's grounds for a mistrial. eh, hopefully it won't be an issue, I was just daydreaming that the trial would begin by June next year.
|
|
|
Post by janetruth on May 26, 2008 15:51:37 GMT -5
The longer it takes, they greyer I get.
|
|
|
Post by petulant on May 26, 2008 17:45:09 GMT -5
The longer it takes, they greyer I get. touche'
|
|
|
Post by shadow on May 27, 2008 11:51:21 GMT -5
Cardinal sean, is that you in "the shadow" chipping away at my karma? gojoKe? don't you worry about a little thing called "doubt" - by the time the DA presents its case, your little buddy will be begging for mercy. And that, you befuddled old man, you can take to the bank! And thanks to all who see me in a positive light. I just want to see the perp go down and the Fisher's find some justice. It won't bring Michelle and Rylan back, but hopefully it will help them to know that whoever caused their unending pain is paying for it. Ok pestulant. I had to create an account just to set this straight. This is my only nic on any board and I could care less about your karma. So now that I have a nic on here.......again, I would kindly ask that you use this nic when you do choose to take pot shots at me as opposed to my name. Cool? And I have no idea who cardinal is, I only know that I am not cardinal.
|
|
|
Post by jezme on May 27, 2008 12:06:21 GMT -5
Cardinal sean, is that you in "the shadow" chipping away at my karma? gojoKe? don't you worry about a little thing called "doubt" - by the time the DA presents its case, your little buddy will be begging for mercy. And that, you befuddled old man, you can take to the bank! And thanks to all who see me in a positive light. I just want to see the perp go down and the Fisher's find some justice. It won't bring Michelle and Rylan back, but hopefully it will help them to know that whoever caused their unending pain is paying for it. Ok pestulant. I had to create an account just to set this straight. This is my only nic on any board and I could care less about your karma. So now that I have a nic on here.......again, I would kindly ask that you use this nic when you do choose to take pot shots at me as opposed to my name. Cool? And I have no idea who cardinal is, I only know that I am not cardinal. I will agree with you shadow. No poster's real names should be typed on here. We are all supposed to be anonymous. On the other part of Petulant's post - yes, the Fisher's do deserve that closure. I do see you in a positive light as well but let's be fair to shadow as well. Thanks!
|
|
|
Post by petulant on May 27, 2008 12:38:29 GMT -5
whatchew tawkin' 'bout willis? errrr sean... I mean shadow? Methinks thou doth protest too much. You created an account to set this straight? That's funny stuff. It's OK for you to call me "pestulant"? Just remember you are the one that posted under sean, and it's still on the blog for all to see. I just can't separate sean, deatheater, the shadow, shadow, et al. I think I shall just call you the whining drama queen from here on out. In case you didn't see the icon in the mention about karma, be advised I was being sarcastic. Positive or negative here matters not in the big picture, as you should well know. If I were you, being a Jason Lynn Young backer, I'd be concerned about my real life karma rather than what someone mistakenly or correctly calls you on a message board. Now did you come here to play whining drama queen again, or did you want to discuss the case? yeah - that's what I thought. TTFN (That's ta ta for now, in board lingo - wouldn't want you to be confused and think it's something vulgar.)
|
|
|
Post by petulant on May 27, 2008 12:43:34 GMT -5
Ok pestulant. I had to create an account just to set this straight. This is my only nic on any board and I could care less about your karma. So now that I have a nic on here.......again, I would kindly ask that you use this nic when you do choose to take pot shots at me as opposed to my name. Cool? And I have no idea who cardinal is, I only know that I am not cardinal. I will agree with you shadow. No poster's real names should be typed on here. We are all supposed to be anonymous. On the other part of Petulant's post - yes, the Fisher's do deserve that closure. I do see you in a positive light as well but let's be fair to shadow as well. Thanks! Thanks & I'll try to behave, but it is pretty funny stuff ;D
|
|
|
Post by petulant on May 27, 2008 13:58:19 GMT -5
Do you feel something in the air? Seems the Brevard natives are getting restless. GojoKe thinks he's a prophet and that other one, who shall remain nameless, returns. Something is in the air, I can feel it.
Oh jayyyyyyyyysonnnnnnnnn - you've had plenty of time to get your affairs in order. How are your wrists? Not too fleshy, I hope. tick, tock... tick, tock... GJ meets again in a week.
|
|
|
Post by jezme on May 27, 2008 15:30:25 GMT -5
I will agree with you shadow. No poster's real names should be typed on here. We are all supposed to be anonymous. On the other part of Petulant's post - yes, the Fisher's do deserve that closure. I do see you in a positive light as well but let's be fair to shadow as well. Thanks! Thanks & I'll try to behave, but it is pretty funny stuff ;D Thank You for not taking that in a defensive manner! Personally, I'd rather not "know" anyone's RL name. Not that I don't care about people here but I've seen how sensitive shadow is about his name being used on other boards. I will give him a lot of credit for not being as bad as GOJO. Shadow only wants to believe the big J (jason, jerk) is innocent and I can understand how he would want to believe and defend the big J. Gojo KNOWS big J is guilty as hell but still chooses to try and defend him. There really is a huge diffenece between the two of them.
|
|
|
Post by shadow on May 27, 2008 15:58:39 GMT -5
whatchew tawkin' 'bout willis? errrr sean... I mean shadow? Methinks thou doth protest too much. You created an account to set this straight? That's funny stuff. It's OK for you to call me "pestulant"? Just remember you are the one that posted under sean, and it's still on the blog for all to see. I just can't separate sean, deatheater, the shadow, shadow, et al. I think I shall just call you the whining drama queen from here on out. In case you didn't see the icon in the mention about karma, be advised I was being sarcastic. Positive or negative here matters not in the big picture, as you should well know. If I were you, being a Jason Lynn Young backer, I'd be concerned about my real life karma rather than what someone mistakenly or correctly calls you on a message board. Now did you come here to play whining drama queen again, or did you want to discuss the case? yeah - that's what I thought. TTFN (That's ta ta for now, in board lingo - wouldn't want you to be confused and think it's something vulgar.) Touche on the "pestulant". I guess I can't ask for something and insult at the same time. You can call me a drama queen/king if you so choose, but that is not why I am here. By all means discuss away. Unlike other "pop-ins", I am not here to insult or bait. (Minus the "pestulant" comment) And try as I might I just don't get anything vulgar out of "TTFN", although I must admit I am not versed in board lingo so the explanation helped.
|
|
|
Post by shadow on May 27, 2008 16:00:53 GMT -5
Thank you jezme.
|
|